![]() Goodness or rightness just doesn’t seem to be something we can empirically investigate. When there’s disagreement about scientific questions, we can conduct experiments to test the validity of rival hypotheses, but it doesn’t seem like we can do anything like that in ethics. And there doesn’t seem to be any objective way to decide who is right. In fact, people in the same family often differ in their ethical beliefs. They think it much more likely that ethics is a matter of personal or cultural opinion, a set of preferences that we happen to have about the way we would like the world to be, or the way we would like people to act.Īfter all, people around the world differ in their ethical beliefs. Many people are skeptical that there are any objective moral truths. Is Animal Pleasure Just as Valuable as Human Pleasure?.Should We All Just Plug Into the Experience Machine?.How Much Should We Care About Other People’s Pleasure and Pain?.Do All Good and Bad Experiences Share A Common Quality?.Doesn’t the Badness of Pain Depend on Our Attitude Toward It?.Surely the Pleasure of a Torturer Isn’t Intrinsically Good.Doesn’t the Fact That Different Things Cause Different People Pleasure and Pain Make Hedonism Relativist/Subjectivist?.The Intrinsic Goodness of Pleasure and Intrinsic Badness of Pain.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |